Sunday, 05 April 2009
The suicide decision
Cyberfriend asks:
“I guess the circumstances triggered the dont exist injunction to be acted upon.
But what can determine the when?”
(end quote)

That is a very Gordian question my pommy friend. Why a person would act on the Don’t exist injunction at one point and not at another? As is hypothesised people most often will make these early decisions like the Don’t exist decision within the first 6 years of life and then it remains in their psyche and only becomes ‘operational’ when certain conditions in life arise. They have decided that suicide is a viable solution to certain life events.
One way to answer your question is to look at the different form the Don’t exist decision can take. Seven alternative suicidal decisions have been proposed:
1. If you don’t change I will kill myself
2. If things get too bad I will kill myself
3. I will show you even if it kills me
4. I will get you to kill me
5. I will kill myself by accident
6. I will almost die (over and over) to get you to love me
7. I will kill myself to hurt you.

If one finds they belong no where that may activate the Don't exist decision
These give some idea as to the life circumstances that a person will need to have before acting on their internalised Don’t exist injunction. For instance with number two decision we find that person known as the share market simpleton. This person has taken great risks in shares and now they have lost everything and this could be in their mind when - things get too bad - and thus they will act on the Don’t exist injunction.
With such people one would be questioning them on what - “If things get too bad” - means. It may be related to the loss of money, or marriage or even their reputation. Once you have identified this then you can begin to understand and make predictions about when this person will act on their Don’t exist injunction.
One could take decision number five - “I will kill myself by accident”. Enquiry into the individual’s life on what they are doing that is risky and then looking at any Child ego state magical thinking around the risks they are taking. This will again allow one to make predictions about when this person will carry out their suicidal decision.

This mother made a smart decision
Suicide decision four - “I will get you to kill me” - sometimes happens in domestic violence situations. Alternatively people on death row can have made this type of Don’t exist decision early on in life.
Decision three - “I will show you even if it kills me” - is sort of suicide from a rebellious position. In this situation one would be seeking information about the person’s current relationships and finding out who and what they would want to ‘show’. Once the information is elicited then one again is more capable of answering the question that Cyberfriend asked - How does one determine when a person will act on their Don’t exist injunction?
Graffiti
10:16 Permalink | Comments (31) | Email this | Tags: suicide, suicide risk, don't exist, child development



Comments
Number 2 "If things get too bad I will kill myself" is my underlying feeling that pushes itself out from time to time. My view of what "too bad" is fluctuates. For a much too long time the threshold for that was very low. Fortunately now it's harder to hit that "too bad" point.
I'm awful at killing myself as evidenced by me still being alive (or maybe there's just enough of my that wants to live too). But Having the option there in the back of my head actually serves to help me. It doesn't help once the danger is more immediate. When it starts making messes. But on a day to day basis it is nice.
I like the idea of a "dont exist injunction" but I think it also involves a battle between the "dont exist injunction " and a "do exist" feeling. Feeling suicidal, for me at least, is a chaotic back and forth between should I or shouldn't I.
Posted by: Lee | Sunday, 05 April 2009
Thank you for your comments Lee and I might do another short post in reaction to some of them, particularly your last sentence.
I understand what you mean when you say that in one sense the option serves to help you as long as there is not an immediate danger. Any more you might want to say on that would be welcome. Like, how do you see it helping you?
Thanks again
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Sunday, 05 April 2009
When suicide? That is something one would ask an astrologer and they wouldnt be able to tell.
I have known some chemo patients who have killed themselves at later stages in their treatment. They became very depressed - it wasnt that the treatment was failing.
I think its generally easier to keep living than to end things when in ill health. In some cases though I would be all for suicide assist and euthenasia.
kenoath
Posted by: kenoath | Sunday, 05 April 2009
It helps with the more minor bad things like 'yes this situation is bad, but it's not quite bad enough to kill myself over, which if it does get worse is an option.'
Most of the time I have a method picked out. I'm very protective of the method of the moment. I feel like sharing it corrupts it.
There have been times where I felt my method had been corrupted or somehow made unusable. And it immediately has pushed me into a depression, often times making me want to die more. I've had times where I became suicidal because I felt my option to kill myself was ruined. Feeling that option is taken away from me makes everything feel like it is crumbling around me.
It's such a strongheld belief that I will kill myself eventually, I just don't know when. It might be at 90. It might be at 25. A threat to that belief I have trouble handling.
Posted by: Lee | Sunday, 05 April 2009
I think that I had/have a "do not exist" clause in my head. But watching my mother's failed suicide attempts put that action into the list of "crappy-things-my-mom-did-that-I-will-not-do-because-I-will-not-be-like-her-when-I-grow-up".
When I was younger and in a less stable environment I felt this as a near constant internal struggle. I don't so much anymore. The "will not do" has long ago outweighed the "do not exist".
-else
Posted by: else | Monday, 06 April 2009
A very interesting post Graffiti.
I was going to make a quip, but having read the comments I wont.
It is interesting to read the seven decisions.
Am I right in thinking that some people who suicide may not have the dont exist injunction?
There are some people who just give up because there is no more hope anymore for them?
I am thinking actually of my grandfather in this case. He didnt die by taking his own life as such. But he was dead within six months of his daughter (my aunt) dying suddenly.
I think he gave up. He loved her very much, but I am not sure if he ever told her.
Posted by: Kahless | Monday, 06 April 2009
I just can't help wondering what it must be like to be dead. I remember seeing all the animals and pets that used to just lie there dead and its intriguing don't you think? Then there's the whole 'sixth sense' or 'ghost whisperer' type story and it just makes me wonder what it must be like to not have a body to live in anymore. Must be strange to keep existing when you feel you shouldn't anymore.
So...
Suicide watch is really only designed for people who don't really want to die but think they feel like they do at the time? It exists to help the people that are 'inbetween' decisions at that moment?
Posted by: roses | Monday, 06 April 2009
Hello Kenoath,
Astrologers and predicting suicide could happen
Maybe if one combined both astrologer and therapist then the prediction might be better.
then one would be an astro-therapist!
Graffiti
Posted by: Tony | Monday, 06 April 2009
Hi Lee,
That is a really good comment that I could use in writing on the topic, May I use it?
How would you react if you wrote down your method of the moment onto a piece of paper or drew a picture of it?
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Monday, 06 April 2009
Hello Else,
Thanks for your comment and it could indeed be part of another post. I am getting so many blog posts to write at the moment due to people's comments!
Cheers
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Monday, 06 April 2009
Hello Kahless,
Anyone who actively sets about ending their life would be seen to have a Don't exist injunction because that is what the injunction means. It is a solution to a problem according to the person.
however your other point is interesting about your grandfather and giving up and does that constitute a 'suicide'
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Monday, 06 April 2009
Tony,
Sure go for it:)
I'm not sure how I'd react to that. I've never considered trying it before. What would be the purpose of it?
I visualize the method in my head a lot though during times of stress. It's soothing
Posted by: Lee | Monday, 06 April 2009
Hello Roses,
Suicide watch had a number of goals Roses. One is to be used by some to manipulate the system. To assist those who were getting closer to implementing their Don't exist decision. As an arse covering exercise by the government
Cheers
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Monday, 06 April 2009
Ohh that makes it a really big excercise by the government. I think their bum is way, like WAY bigger than even mine!
Posted by: roses | Monday, 06 April 2009
Hi Lee,
thanks for your extra comment:
"I visualize the method in my head a lot though during times of stress. It's soothing"
I will use that as well.
I have a blog post in mind on this topic. It is just a matter of finding the time to write it which I may do tonite (it is 8.30am here at the moment).
I can't tell you what the purpose of my writing down or drawing request to you is until you have done it.
So how about you do it and tell me what happened and then I can tell you the purpose of my request.
Cheers
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Monday, 06 April 2009
Tony,
okay. Do you want me to do it when I'm stressed or just during a normal time?
Posted by: Lee | Monday, 06 April 2009
Hi Lee,
Do it the next available time that you have.
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Monday, 06 April 2009
Would suicide watch be a kind of entrappment Tony? Certainly the laws and health dept policies would tend to strike up a kind of parent - child relationship with the potential suicider inviting a certain percent to "do it". Numbers 1,2,3,4 and 5 categories.
kenoath
Posted by: kenoath | Monday, 06 April 2009
Astro - Therapy is already a world wide phenomena Tony. Well perhaps for those brave enough to claim they are one. Its hard enough to practice Astrology in England and America even without the Therapy modality added. I kind of prefer my regular clients at community centres rather than being too different and exposed to uneducated and perochial views. I think that I stick my head out enough.
kenoth
Posted by: kenoath | Monday, 06 April 2009
Hello Kenoath,
I have had psychics of various kinds refer me clients over the years. Often they were a prior client of mine at some point.
From what I hear the referred clients tell me about their contact with the psychic in one way it is just a counselling session. And some of them I think are good counsellors.
Cheers
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Monday, 06 April 2009
Well Kenoath when a person is on suicide watch, at the high risk level, they are kind of trapped as they are usually placed in a special cell where they are constantly observed and they are certainly not let out to wander around the prison.
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Monday, 06 April 2009
Interesting post and great comments.
For me, the reason is clearly impaired reasoning while in the midst of deep depression. Usually, when I come out of a suicidal depression, I know I am on the way to being better by having this moment of clarity where I think, "Oh God, how could I ever have thought of that?"
But, once having opened up the possibility during one of those depressions, as Lee says, there is some comfort in the idea that you are making a choice to stay alive, that the suffering won't be endless. That sometimes appears on the way down into a depression - the reminder that if it truly gets intolerable - there is a way out.
What about that as a coping mechanism? Bad?
Posted by: S | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
K, I drew the picture, now what?
Posted by: Lee | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
You do get people who passively "give up on life" when they lose hope and can shrivel up and die of 'natural causes'.
And then again "do not exist" injunction; some may not kill themselves but not have much of an existence.
How about someone with a severe depression, who lives in a room and dont venture into the outside world. May be 'dead' inside.
Posted by: Kahless | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
Hello Sara,
Thank you for your candor.
The final question you asked about the coping mechanism is precisely the next post I am going to do that was initiated by Lee's comment. I was going to do it last night but I have just been too busy yesterday and also I wanted to wait until Lee had finished either drawing or writing her method.
Bad as a coping mechanism?
Yes and no is my answer to be explained soon. More complicated than it appears on the surface. Watch this space!
Easter holiday soon so i will write some further posts then on suicidology as there were others inspired by comments from Else and Kahless. These people do not know how much this helps me in getting comments on a variation of the post I have written and thus leading to further ideas on the area in general. then I place it as a collective on my website in the blog post categories. I actually added another two the other day.
then I wanted to comment on the apologising therapist that came from your last blog post.
Cheers
Graffiti
Posted by: Tony | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
Hi Lee,
So you drew a picture of the method.
Can I see it?
Tony
Posted by: Graffiti | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
Tony,
I'm not sure I'm comfortable sharing it. I might be if I don't give an explanation of it. Just looking at it without an explanation you'd have a general idea of the method but not have a full understanding. There's a key detail that you probably couldn't figure out without me telling you. That detail is one I don't want to share (worrying about it being corrupted and also it's a little unusual. I pride myself on unusual suicide methods and I would feel touchy about any comments relating to this unusual choice in this specific detail. The other parts though are more generic and I'm more comfortable with sharing.) I might be willing to share the image without that detail.
I'm gonna take a shower and think on it. Maybe sleep on it.
Posted by: Lee | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
Okay I decided to share:)
http://talesofacrazypsychmajor.wordpress.com/files/2009/04/drawing.jpg
But I reserve the right to not answer certain questions.
Posted by: Lee | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
Hi Lee,
thank you for letting me have a look at your drawing.
It strikes me a true drawing in that it carries detail rather than just a drawing that you are trying not to draw if that makes any sense. there strikes me as their being an investment in you in saying this to me (the world)
So now you have shared it does that corrupt it? That is the issue that I would seek to understand and want to know about this process of method creation, corruption and then recreation. the word corruption in itself is worthy of more understanding.
Also neuroses thrive on secrecy that is another reason why I use drawing or writing a lot as it can disempower the neurosis, but that is another post on the therapeutic use of drawing.
Thanks again
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
No it hasn't been corrupted. Maybe because my sharing here was voluntary whereas other times things have been forced out that I didn't want to share? Or maybe because I didn't share that particular detail :P
Posted by: Lee | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
Well that is good that it has not been corrupted Lee, (I think).
Maybe another possibility as well. that sharing on the blogosphere is not really sharing at all, because of its anonymity.
But as you say there is the particular detail. Perhaps the key to the gordian knot? I will have to just wait and see if you let me know what it is one day
Cheers
Tony
Posted by: Tony | Tuesday, 07 April 2009
Post a comment