Saturday, 02 May 2009

Physical anatomy or psychological anatomy?

 

More women in politics. 

Originally written on March 26th, 2007.

A topic in the news where I live at the moment is the number of women in politics in the state where I live and around the world. Apparently there are more female heads of state now than there has ever been before. And that grand total is - 16. 

 

But to me it does not make sense. 

Typical masculine qualities are = assertive, competitive. tough, logical, 

unemotional, aggressive, dominating. lacking insight, unoriginal, vulgar. 

Typical feminine qualities are = domestic, creative, individualistic, sensitive, 

intelligent, passive, idealistic, conciliatory, peace loving, sociable. 

 

Amy winehouse...jpeg

Is Amy physically female and psychologically male?

 

 

I am not saying that women are this and men are that. These lists are what are typically described as masculine and feminine qualities. Males and females have qualities from both lists. The more feminine qualities you have the feminine you will be and seem to others to be a feminine character. The same for masculine qualities. 

 

So what does it mean to count the number of females in politics (and commerce for that matter). It means the number of people who are anatomically female and at the upper levels of politics and business. But what does that mean in real terms. 

   

To be at such a level the LCD (Lowest common denominator) rules. You have to work very long hours, have to see little of your partner and children, suppress your feelings, be a bit paranoid and get them before they get you, be ruthless, be calculating, be competitive, etc. For a woman to succeed in upper level politics she has to think, feel and act like a man naturally does. 

 

Do you actually want to live like that? This list seems to pretty well much fit with the masculine qualities. If a person goes to a job in the board room of a large corporation and is sensitive, conciliatory, domestic, peace loving, how long are they going to last? I would guess that they will not be back for their second day on the job. 

 

Girl with gun.jpg

Does the difference in physical strength between men and women have an impact on the psychological dynamics of their relationships?

 

 

So when one counts up the number of women in politics they are counting those people who are anatomically female and psychologically male. So that person is female but in another sense has a predominance of masculine qualities. It would seem more accurate to count those numbers who have more feminine personality traits than masculine traits. I would suggest that if you did that the grand total of female heads of state in the world - 0. 

 

To simply add up people who are anatomically female has no meaning like one could count up the number of people in politics who had red hair. One could do that but it means nothing. 

 

And if you added up the men who were in politics they would be the men who are anatomically male and masculine in personality as well. So its not the anatomical female who isn’t there it is the person who has a predominance of feminine characteristics who isn’t there. And that would include many men.

 

Graffiti

 

Comments

"I'm not a pheasant plucker, i'm a pheasant plucker's son
I'm only plucking pheasants till the pheasant plucker comes."

I like this post... but it does sound a bit like a riddle or tongue twister.

I think you have stated something that may not be so obvious but may need to be obvious-ated. Now that you've obvious-ated it i think it makes sense.

Posted by: roses | Saturday, 02 May 2009

Well that is good Roses,

I think!

I think Amy is great. Just misunderstood.

Graffiti

Posted by: Tony | Saturday, 02 May 2009

I noticed that you ascribed creativity as a femine quality. Politics and commerce need more of that today than in any other recent time. I think that may explain some things. As far as the ruthlessness factor in business goes, I have labooured under that fallacy before, but I was on the wrong track with that thinking. I call it a fallacy because my greatest successes in selling real estate (which was my main career) did not come from ruthlessness. They came from caring for the financial needs and goals of my clients as I would care for my own financial concerns. These were my most fabulous successes in business. And lucky for those clients, one of my main worries for them was making sure they were not set up with a bad loan. I was a success because I had compassion for them and treated them the way I would hope to be treated by someone more knowledgeable than I if I were outside my own area of expertise. In these times especially, I think of some of them. I imagine them in their well-bought homes, safe from the storm. It makes me happy for their relative safety. I was successful with them and there was no ruthlessness. There was true caring, stark honesty, patience, and diligence... all in the strange and unlikely place where caution and creativity meet. I wish I could replicate that mix in some other areas of my life. Maybe someday.

Interesting post, Tony.

xoxoxoxoxo

Posted by: Ethereal Highway | Saturday, 02 May 2009

Hi Lynn,

I am the same I think.

I have run my own business for the last 25 years and I think it has been successful and I would not say that I have been ruthless.

However, I know I could have gone further in my business and profession if had spent less time with the family and more time doing work related activities - committees, boards, workshops, conferences and so forth.

Hugs

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Saturday, 02 May 2009

Great post Tony. Makes sense to me. Work have put me on a course in September which discusses this very thing. You see they want to encourage more women in senior positions. Thanks for doing my pre-work for me!! ;-)

I like the phrase I heard David Beckham once say...

"The harder I train, the luckier I am"

I think men, in general, will put in longer hours which is a success factor. I would definately go further if I worked longer hours.

But life is choices. And I dont want long hours at work.

I think Amy is fab too.

Posted by: Kahless | Sunday, 03 May 2009

Hey Tony,
Want to read my paper I just finished? It's about when in order to conform to gender stereotypes people to express diffrent emotions from what they actually feel.
This post makes me think of it, also it's already on my mind from recently spending a bunch of time writing it. So it probably only takes a weak connection to think of it:P

Posted by: Lee | Sunday, 03 May 2009

Hello Kahless,

Yes it does seem that way about men. there is less pressure on them to spend time with children and family so they can put in the longer hours overall.

I hope you tell us how your course went about women getting to more senior positions. I assume they will do role plays on how to be ruthless and how to care about your kids less.

Just joking!

Cheers

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Sunday, 03 May 2009

Yes Lee do show us your paper,

Put some of it in your blog perhaps or send it to me for a read.

I am particularly interested in the bit you mention one expressing different emotions from what they actually feel.

Happy Sunday to you

Graffiti

Posted by: Graffiti | Sunday, 03 May 2009

Tony,
I'll email it to you(and to anyone else here who might be interested). I might post some in my blog. After I get the grade back though. Sometimes professors google pieces of papers to make sure they weren't plagiarized and I'd rather not have my blog pop up on a search result:P

Posted by: Lee | Sunday, 03 May 2009

OK Lee,

You would imagine that those professors would have better things to do with their time than goggling blogs!

Your most recent post on your blog is sort of about the same thing as my latest post on my Graffiti blog. Maybe it is the cosmic consciousness at work.

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Sunday, 03 May 2009

Tony,

Yea you'd think so, but apparently it's fairly common practice.

Wait, is that a diffrent blog? I'm confused. I thought this was your graffiti blog.

Did you know that it looks like we're on close to exactly opposite sleeping schedules? You respond to comments when I'm about to go to bed (I assume it's morning there now) and other times right when I've just woken up (nightime for you)
You wished me a happy Sunday, I've got 2 more hours till Sunday starts:)

Posted by: Lee | Sunday, 03 May 2009

Yes Lee it is morning time here on Sunday.

I must do some chores in the yard today

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Sunday, 03 May 2009

Er, Yeah. Who's amy? I see her picture up there but i don't know if i know her. Am i supposed to know who she is?

I was also wondering... did you get your chores in the yard done today? I hope so.

Have a nice sunday night. Well, *shrugs* because i think that would be nice.

Posted by: roses | Sunday, 03 May 2009

Everybody knows Amy, Roses.

It seems you need to brush up on the pop scene.

I did get a few chores done in the yard today. Raked the front area and put all the leaves in the bin

Cheers

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Sunday, 03 May 2009

I'm practicing... telekinesis. Its fun.

I don't know Amy, i also don't know if i like her music either. But when i'm listening next to something i like (music) i'll remember to listen to who it was - catch their name.

I'm glad you got some stuff done today. I'm into a collection of fantasy books at the moment. Gosh it's fun!

Happy Sunday night sleep and i hope you have lovely dreams.

Posted by: roses | Sunday, 03 May 2009

Tony,
the course isnt until September. I will let you know how it goes. I was put on it, not sure it would be by first choice. But it should be interesting to see what other womens views are as to why we are less represented at board level.

Roses,

Amy Winehouse. A UK singer. Her voice is fantastic. A talented individual. Youtube, "Back to Black" - that is one of her songs.

Posted by: Kahless | Monday, 04 May 2009

Graffit,

your picture with the comment
"Does the difference in physical strength between men and women have an impact on the psychological dynamics of their relationships?"

do you ever think how you would react if someone put a gun to your head?

Posted by: Kahless | Monday, 04 May 2009

Hello Kahless,

You maybe eliciting some of your internal psychological dynamics via the analysis of ones daydreams. Just as important as ones (night) dreams. I can't recall ever having such a daydream but I could have and just forgotten about it..

Graffiti

Posted by: Tony | Monday, 04 May 2009

Roses,
As Kahless says Amy is a very good singer and she is also an ongoing train wreck. Noted as much for her off the stage antics as on the stage.

In and out of rehab and minor indiscretions like being charged for punching a photographer in the face who has just stuck a camera in her face.

Of course all that does not hurt her record sales one may add.

Graffiti

Posted by: Tony | Monday, 04 May 2009

Hi Graffiti.

Mmmm. You comment went a little over my head.
**zoom**

I daydream death most days actually. Not necessarily my own. My own 33% of the time and others, in fact others quite a bit (66%.)

Does that make me odd?

I thought it somewhat a common occurrence.

Posted by: Kahless | Monday, 04 May 2009

I would say that it is not such a common occurrence, fantasizing ones death Kahless.

Recall one of your daydreams and draw a picture of it and I will analyse it for you. Make it a vivid daydream with lots of detail, names and who says and does what and feels what.

graffiti

Posted by: Graffiti | Monday, 04 May 2009

Ok.

This week I had MRs K on a train that blew up with a terrorist bomb! I was at the train station waiting for her train to come in, which never did (cos it was blown up.)

Same scenario, on another day this week, I was at work then someone told me about the bomb and called me out of a meeting.
I am not sure what I would draw but I will try tomorrow!

Posted by: Kahless | Monday, 04 May 2009

Out of interest, do you remember the promise you once asked me to make?

I say because that is a dilemma I have in my day-dreaming?

Posted by: Kahless | Monday, 04 May 2009

Unfortunately I do not recall the promise Kahless.

Tony

Posted by: Graffiti | Monday, 04 May 2009

In some ways I am glad Tony, cos it was a commitment I regret making.

In a lot of other ways it makes me feel sad.

I am off to bed now. Goodnight. I hope you have a good week.

xx.

Posted by: Kahless | Monday, 04 May 2009

Are going to let me know what that promise was Kahless?

Tony

Posted by: Graffiti | Monday, 04 May 2009

Oh, well that makes Amy's life interesting i guess. Thank you for explaining that.

Did you throw away my comment and then answer it anyway? Cheeky!

I still think her music is 'retro' type feel - deliberately arranged that way of course - and she reminds me of the theme songs of 'James Bond' movies.

I hope she 'Amy' doesn't get too dizzy and fall off.

Posted by: roses | Monday, 04 May 2009

I was very very drunk last night!!!
Just as well today was a holiday.

I hate to think what comments I littered blogland with!

Posted by: Kahless | Tuesday, 05 May 2009

I remember the promise, Kahless. You and I made the same one, each to the other. You know damn well there is A LOT of shit I don't remember, but I remember THAT. I will hold my end and I am holding you to yours as well. Sometimes I'm a shit and lazy friend with my brain out to lunch - but *I'm still here*. I still care. Promise me again, Kahless. Just tell me you promise and I will do the same (with one tiny exclusion which we can talk about if you like).

Posted by: Lynn | Tuesday, 05 May 2009

OK ladies,
You now have my attention.
So what was the promise

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Tuesday, 05 May 2009

That is good Kahless,
instead of driving while under the influence you were blogging while under the influence.

5 demerit points

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Tuesday, 05 May 2009

It's in your comments somewhere, Tony. I don't remember where or when, but I'm pretty sure it's in here somewhere. Off to bed now. Maybe we can talk about it later if Kahless wants to.

xoxoxoxoxoxo

Posted by: Lynn | Tuesday, 05 May 2009

Lynn,
at the moment I have 8288 comments on record, and I have deleted a whole bunch of posts and their comments as well.

So I might pass on looking through them as it might have been one I had deleted anyway.

We will just have to enjoy the mysterious side of Kahless and her promise.

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Tuesday, 05 May 2009

Well I am not sure how to respond really. I certainly wasn't going to backtrack on a conversation of a year or so ago. Not that it is any big shakes. I have already made a complete twat of myself once today by being somewhat badly behaved in a meeting.

But then again, my footie team is in the final of the European Cup, we are going (to Rome), so what else is there to life eh?

Basically Tony you asked me to promise to email you in the event of Mrs K's death. Not something I suggested. I had wondered recently whether it would be an odd thing to do and you would think "what the fuck?". My hunches are mostly correct. Now I know it would be something completely odd to email a stranger.

And this is slightly different to our deal Lynn. Which stands. (Minor contractual exclusions applying.)

Posted by: Kahless | Wednesday, 06 May 2009

I haven't had a chance to read through all the comments here, so I'm not sure if I'm repeating anything, but...I disagree with the entire basis of this post, Tony :)

I won't deny there are indeed some biological differences, generally speaking, between males and females. However, I think the vast majority of our perceived differences-- including all those you listed here-- are socialized. From birth we begin learning that certain traits apply to males, others to females. When we stray too far from these false norms, we're betraying nature (and there are nothing but negative connotations to that!) I challenge everyone, myself included, to work on being aware of the traits and abilities we assign to each sex on a daily basis, and really think about where those ideas are coming from, and whether they're valid.

I'll leave you with a funny/scary list that illustrates this point.

HOW TO TELL A BUSINESSMAN FROM A BUSINESSWOMAN:

A businessman is aggressive; a businesswoman is pushy.
A businessman is good on details; she’s picky.
He loses his temper because he’s so involved in his job; she’s bitchy.
When he’s depressed (or hungover), everyone tiptoes past his office; she’s moody, so it must be her time of the month.
He follows through; she doesn’t know when to quit.
He’s confident; she’s conceited.
He stands firm; she’s impossible to deal with.
He is firm; she’s hard.
He’s a man of the world; she’s been around.
He drinks because of the excessive job pressure; she’s a lush.
He isn’t afraid to say what he thinks; she’s mouthy.
He exercises authority diligently; she’s power mad.
He’s close-mouthed; she’s secretive.
He climbed the ladder of success; she slept her way to the top.
He’s a stern taskmaster; she’s hard to work for.
He’s witty; she’s sarcastic.

Posted by: annabel | Thursday, 07 May 2009

I like the way you can explain the unexplainable so well Tony. Recently I considered Jungs "Pleroma" - he sort of gives a warning about such a thinking adventure, however he also stresses that humans need to differentiate themselves instead of winding up disintegrated as nothingness of the Pleroma. Thantos kind of thing I imagine.

kenoath aka Kingsley

Posted by: kenoath | Thursday, 07 May 2009

I'm glad our deal stands, {{{{{Kahless}}}}}.

Posted by: Lynn | Thursday, 07 May 2009

Hi Kahless,

I am not sure of the context and why I would request such a promise as I am not usually into promises.

but I am glad that she is fine now

Cheers

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Thursday, 07 May 2009

Hi Annabel,

thank you for your list about business women and men

Very funny.
I am sure there is another list around with the alternate given that show women to be favoured over men. When I find it I will post it on your blog amidst the house fires and all.

Differences learned or innate? I agree with you in part but I probably conclude that there are some more innate differences than you argue.

From an outsider (male) looking in on the female liberation movement there is one thing that I think they never resolved. the confusion between difference and inequality. People can be different and still be equal.

Thanks for dropping by my friend

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Thursday, 07 May 2009

Hello Kingsley.

You had me wondering what a Pleroma was! My spell checker certainly does not like it.

But as you know I like that thanatos

Cheers

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Thursday, 07 May 2009

My list was not meant as an attack on men. I think gender assumptions hurt men just as much as they do women. My challenge is not to look at all the ways men oppress women, rather to look at all the ways society's gender structure oppresses everyone.

Humans with vaginas are domestic, passive, sensitive, etc. (your terms,) or else they're not "doing" female right. Humans with penises are vulgar, aggressive, lacking insight, etc., or they're not not proper men. Those aren't great options.

We have a long way to go before women have the same power, privilege, and prestige as men do. On the other hand, the fallout from second-wave feminism has left men with two choices, with relation to women: they can be the oppressor, or the doormat. The women's liberation movement (necessarily) tore traditional gender roles apart, but now we need something to build them back up.

OK, that's enough feminist rambling from me. I guess we'll agree to disagree on the innateness of gender identity.

Posted by: annabel | Friday, 08 May 2009

Hello Annabel,

It is probably better not to call the two lists masculine and feminine characteristics, but instead to call them A & B. As a group men have more A characteristics than B. And as a group women tend to have more B characteristics than A.

So it is not a matter of, "We have a long way to go before women have the same power, privilege, and prestige as men do."

If women as a group want more power and prestige then they have to become more psychologically male and have more A characteristics and less B characteristics. That is how politics and commerce work. But who wants to live the life style as a top politician or business person. As I mentioned before that means many things including hardly seeing your family and being married to your job.

At the moment more men are prepared to do that than women. If as a group women want such power then they have to be more willing to be married to their job and put their children a poor second.

Finally I am glad we can agree to disagree Annabel. From what I have seen you can at times have significant A characteristics that would be onerous to be on the receiving end of. So perhaps you are a living example of what you are proposing.

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Saturday, 09 May 2009

politics and commerce were created by men, in accordance with archaic gender roles. that's why they work that way.

thank you for what i THINK was a compliment at the end :)

Posted by: annabel | Saturday, 09 May 2009

Hello Annabel,

It was meant to be a compliment. I think it is good how you have male energy like that. Like a fire that could burn down a house

Tony

Posted by: Tony | Saturday, 09 May 2009

Post a comment